68

words when start talking bringing in -- number one, the
video is narrated, which I have a huge problem with, but
you have already watched it. They narrate their side of
the story. Mr. Bunker who is in the courtroom narrates
it and plays it back the clips that he wants. It hurts
bad enough getting that in, much less having another
person come in. You have got the play by play, and you
have the person doing the analysis of the game, and
that’s what they want here. I think just have the videos
put in, I respect the Court’s ruling and will abide by
that, but I think they want the whole thing here. I
think it’s getting to the point that there is going to be
a side show just at that video and they are going to
spring back around and put the religion on trial again

think speaks for itself. It is abundantly clear what it
is and what it isn’t. Any testimony in that regard is
cumulative and not relevant and take the focus off of
this incident and put the focus on that incident. I
don’t think it is appropriate.

MR. DOUGLAS DE VLAMING: Judge, may I be
heard?

MR. DOUGLAS DE VLAMING: Judge, I don’t
think it is going to out the focus on that incident.