6

not appear in on any ethics order. It causes bad public
relations. This policy letter does not cancel any policy
on the treatment or handling of a treatment of a
suppressive person.”

So, although the State’s witnesses may
testify that they don’t know what “Fair Game” is and they
don’t implement it, the cancellation order clearly shows
that the policy of treatment is still in place, they just
don’t say anything about it. And Mr. Oliver will testify
about that.

We told you and you ruled upon it in your
order on the motion in limine about our posture that the
entire policy per Scientologist and their treatment of
critics is to prove them up to be a criminal. We found a
lot of that documented in the Scientology paperwork and
in their books. We brought with us some books written by

and by people in OSA. We have paperwork that shows how
critics of Scientology are to be treated.

What they state is that every time they
have investigated the background of a critic of
Scientology we have found crimes for which that person
agreed to be imprisoned under existing law. We do not
find critics of Scientology who do not have criminal
pasts. Over and over we have proved this. If you oppose