165

165
 
THE COURT:
8,9, and 10 out?
MR. DENIS DE 1/LAMING:
8 is inconsistent
statements, no convictions —— you are right 8, 9, and 10
out.
 
THE COURT:
8,9, and 10 are out. Okay.
MR. DENIS DE 1/LAMING: Judge, I think
 
Defendant’s statements ——
THE COURT: I took that out also.
 
MR. DENIS DE VLAMING:
Oh, you did?
THE COURT:
Yes, I did. I knew there was
something else that I took out and I couldn’t find it.
But there were no out of court statements that I am aware
so I see no need to give that instruction unless, Mr.
Tyson, you saw something or heard something we didn’t.
Anything else?
 
MR. TYSON:
You are taking out the
Williams’ Rule, correct?
 
THE COURT:
I am, yes, because both of you
have asked me to.
 
MR. DENIS DE VLAMING:
Judge, quite
obviously the closing argument statement that is what you
give in advance of closing arguments, obviously not as a
jury instruction at the time you give the rest of them.
 
THE COURT:
You must have an earlier
edition. That’s not part of mine, and you are right.

165