205

the other hand, if after carefully considering, comparing
and weighing all the evidence, there is not an abiding
conviction of guilt, or, if having a conviction one which
is not stable but one which wavers and vacillates, then
the charge is not proved beyond every reasonable doubt
and you must find the Defendant not guilty because of the
doubt is reasonable.

It is to the evidence introduced into this
trial, and to it alone, that you are to look for that
proof.

A reasonable doubt as to the guilt of the
Defendant may arise from the evidence, a conflict in the
evidence, or the lack of evidence.

If you have a reasonable doubt you should
find the Defendant not guilty. If you have no reasonable
doubt you should find the Defendant guilty.

It’s up to you decide what evidence is
reliable. You should use your common sense in deciding
which evidence in the best evidence and which evidence
should not be relied upon in considering your verdict.
You may find some of the evidence not reliable, or less
reliable than other evidence.

You should consider how the witnesses

acted, as well as what they said. Some things you should
consider are: