62
62
 
Mr. Tyson was addressing, other than the portion that he
used?
 
MS. RIVELLINI:
Yes, sir, on page 883
where it talks suppressive acts, anybody who does those
things, any person who agrees that would do such thing, a
suppressive act, out of self—interest, only to the
detriment of all others they cannot be granted the rights
ordinarily accorded rational beings. So this paragraph
within its own policy completely contradicts that you
can’t do someone. They don’t even treat them like a
human being.
 
THE COURT:
But his paragraph pertained to
violations of the law. I am not sure those two things
are congruous.
 
MS. RIVELLINI:
Judge, I think if you look
at one versus the other, to take just his portion out of
context is completely misleading as to what their real
policy is, which is if you don’t treat someone like a
rational human being --
 
THE COURT:
So you want to enter just one
page?
 
MS. RIVELLINI:
I will be happy to limit
it to that.
 
MR. TYSON:
I will object to that. It is
putting the religion on trial. It’s obvious from the

62